A cornerstone teaching — Paraclete Edward-Jay-Robin

The De Facto Deception & the Ground of Lawful Authority

His position: the corporate offices styled as government operate de facto — not de jure — and use carefully drafted words to obtain a consent the reader never knowingly gave.

5 min readHis words, preserved in full below

In this teaching

Check out the links — the de-facto reference shelf — He opens with a curated link list (Charter s. 32, the Governor General archive page he reads as a 'de facto admission', the World Bank's de-facto-government policy, and dictionary definitions of 'defacto' and 'usurp'), assembling the sources he uses to build the de-facto-government thesis.
Registration as submission — He links a 'What is a Charity Corporation' article under the line 'If you register with defacto governments, they are God!' — framing voluntary registration as effectively placing the office in a god-like position over the registrant.
Where is Canada, and what are the provinces? — He poses the central question and points to Section 30 of the Charter and the Canada Lands Surveys Act, arguing his position that deceptive words are used to convince a reader to believe a lie and that 'Canada is a fraud' which does not encompass the recognized de facto provinces under the 55th parallel.
Section 30 of the Charter, quoted verbatim — He reproduces the deeming clause exactly — a reference to a province 'shall be deemed to include a reference to the Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories' — as the textual anchor for the parse that follows.
'Includes' and the maxim inclusio unius est exclusio alterius — His interpretive move: the word 'includes' enumerates only what follows and excludes everything else, so (his position) the named provinces like BC and Alberta were never 'included', and only the Yukon and NWT are the provinces deemed to be spoken of.
The Criminal Code comparison and 'tacit acceptance' — He argues the Criminal Code's applicable-area definition works the same way, and that knowing the meaning of 'Includes' is essential to see 'what has been offered to you for your tacit acceptance' — tying the parse back to the consent theme.
The 'Canada Lands' definition, quoted in full — He quotes s. 24(1) of the Canada Lands Surveys Act verbatim — confining 'Canada Lands' to Her Majesty's lands in Yukon, NWT, Nunavut, National Parks, and enumerated Indigenous/treaty land categories — reading it as further support that the named provinces fall outside.
On 'person' — the closing pointer — He closes by pointing to a third-party freedom-school.com PDF he characterizes as 'a real definitive explanation about person', sending the reader onward to the question of legal personhood.

This page is one of the Minister's working study notes — a curated set of links, statutory quotations, and annotations rather than a finished essay. It is gathered here faithfully, in his own words, so a reader can follow his argument from the inside. Nothing on this page is legal advice; it is his teaching and his stated position.

At its heart is a single claim the Minister returns to across his ministry: that the entity people are taught to call their government often operates as a de facto power — an office holding itself out as lawful authority — rather than a de jure one rightly grounded. His position is that such offices lean on precisely worded definitions to secure a person's tacit acceptance, so that consent is presumed from silence rather than asked for in plain speech. He teaches that the remedy begins with reading the words for yourself: "The word ``Ìncludes`` is essential to know the meaning of to see what has been offered to you for your tacit acceptance."

“These links and information prove that deceptive words are used to convince you to believe a lie...”

“The word ``includes`` indicates only that which follows the word....all else is excluded..”

To press that point he parses two texts. He quotes Section 30 of the Canadian Charter verbatim — the clause that deems a reference to "a province" to include the Yukon and Northwest Territories — and applies the interpretive maxim inclusio unius est exclusio alterius (the inclusion of one is the exclusion of all else) to argue, as his position, that the named provinces are not the ones being spoken of. He reads the Canada Lands Surveys Act's definition of "Canada Lands" the same way. A reader should hold these as the Minister's interpretation: the courts and the drafters read Section 30 the opposite way — as an inclusive clause that extends the Charter equally to the territories — and the "Canada Lands" definition is a land-survey administration definition, not a definition of national borders. Those mainstream readings are noted in the citations below so the reader can weigh his argument against the texts themselves.

Throughout, the adversary in the Minister's frame is never a people and never any neighbour. It is an office, a system, a way that institutions draft and presume — and behind that, a spiritual struggle over who a person bows to. He frames registration with a de-facto office as effectively elevating that office to a god-like place over the registrant, which is why his teaching reaches for Scripture. He sets the ordained-authority warning of Romans 13 ("the powers that be are ordained of God") beside Israel's demand for a king in 1 Samuel 8 ("they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me"), and beside the call of Revelation 18:4 ("Come out of her, my people"). The question he keeps live is not rebellion against neighbours but allegiance: lawful authority is grounded in the Creator, and a counterfeit authority is one that asks to stand in that place.

For clarity on the boundary of his path: the Minister's broader ministry expressly rejects the UCC / admiralty / "redemption" / "strawman" route as a false trail. This page is part of his lawful-authority study, not that path, and his rejection of it remains his explicit protective boundary — see his teaching "Why I Reject the UCC."

Scripture & sources he stands on

Romans 13:1 (KJV)His interpretation

“Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.”

KJV text verified verbatim. This verse is woven into the reader intro as part of the ministry's broader doctrinal frame on ordained authority; it does not appear on this specific source page. The Minister's frame is that lawful authority is grounded in the Creator, so a de-facto office that asks to stand in God's place is a counterfeit of ordained authority — not a license against any neighbour.

1 Samuel 8:7 (KJV)His interpretation

“And the LORD said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them.”

KJV text verified verbatim. Woven into the intro as the ministry's allegiance theme (choosing an earthly system over the Creator's reign); not quoted on this source page. Framed as his theological reading, not asserted as commentary on any people.

Revelation 18:4 (KJV)His interpretation

“And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.”

KJV text verified verbatim. Woven into the intro as the ministry's 'come out of the system' call; not quoted on this source page. The adversary in his frame is the system ('her'), never a people.

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 30 (Constitution Act, 1982)His interpretation

“A reference in this Charter to a province or to the legislative assembly or legislature of a province shall be deemed to include a reference to the Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories, or to the appropriate legislative authority thereof, as the case may be.”

The text he quotes is verbatim-accurate to Section 30 as enacted in 1982. HIS interpretation is that 'includes/deemed to include' excludes the named provinces. This is contested: the mainstream legal reading (Justice Canada Charterpedia; Wikipedia) is the opposite — Section 30 is an INCLUSIVE deeming clause that EXTENDS the Charter to the territories so it applies there equally to the provinces, not a clause that removes the provinces. Presented strictly as the Minister's position, not as established law.

inclusio unius est exclusio alterius (Latin canon of construction)His interpretation

“the inclusion of one is the exclusion of another / all else”

The maxim and its meaning are genuine; the more common form is 'expressio unius est exclusio alterius', and 'inclusio unius...' is a recognized variant phrasing of the same canon. Verified meaning: where a text lists items, unlisted items are presumed excluded. Caveat (per legal sources): it is a presumption, rarely decisive on its own, and is not applied where it would defeat the clear purpose of the text or produce an absurd result — which is why the Minister's application to Charter s. 30 is his interpretation, not a settled conclusion.

Canada Lands Surveys Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. L-6, Part II, s. 24(1) — definition of 'Canada Lands'His interpretation

“(1) In this Part, 'Canada Lands' means (a) any lands belonging to Her Majesty in right of Canada or of which the Government of Canada has power to dispose that are situated in Yukon, the Northwest Territories, Nunavut or in any National Park of Canada and any lands that are [enumerated surrendered lands/reserves, Category IA land, Sechelt lands, Yukon First Nations settlement land, Kanesatake interim land base, and Tlicho lands]; and (b) any lands under water belonging to Her Majesty in right of Canada or in respect of any rights in which the Government of Canada has power to dispose.”

The definition he quotes matches the statute (verified at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca, s. 24). HIS reading is that this confines 'Canada' and excludes the named provinces. Important verified context: this is a LAND-SURVEY ADMINISTRATION definition — it scopes which lands the federal Canada Lands survey system administers (territories, national parks, specified Indigenous/treaty lands) — NOT a definition of Canada's national borders, sovereignty, or jurisdiction over the provinces (provincial Crown lands are administered provincially, which is why they are not in this federal-survey list). Presented as the Minister's interpretation only.

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 32 (Constitution Act, 1982)His interpretation

“Section 32 sets out to whom the Charter applies (the Parliament and government of Canada, and the legislature and government of each province).”

He links Section 32 to support his application/scope argument. The section is real and concerns the Charter's application to the federal and provincial governments. His use of it to support the de-facto thesis is his interpretation, not a documented legal conclusion.

Criminal Code of Canada — applicable-area / 'province' definitionHis interpretation

“The Minister asserts the Criminal Code uses 'the same definition of applicable area' and refers only to the Yukon and NWT as provinces.”

This is the Minister's annotation comparing the Charter definition to the Criminal Code. We did not independently verify a Criminal Code provision matching this characterization, and the source page cites no specific Criminal Code section. Treat as his stated position, unverified. A human reviewer should confirm before any reliance.

Governor General of Canada page (archived snapshot, web.archive.org, 2007)His interpretation

“Archive page - The Governor General of Canada (showing defacto admission)”

He links an archived gg.ca snapshot and characterizes it as a 'de facto admission'. The archive URL is a real Wayback Machine snapshot, but the characterization that it constitutes an 'admission' of de-facto government is his interpretation, not a documented fact. Unverified.

World Bank — 'Dealing With Defacto Governments' (operational policy)His interpretation

“Dealing With Defacto Governments - The World Bank”

He links a World Bank operational-manual page on de-facto governments as evidence for his thesis. The World Bank has had operational guidance on dealing with de-facto governments, but the specific archived link and the inference he draws from it are his interpretation; the original link is dated and was not re-verified here.

freedom-school.com/person.pdf — third-party document on 'person'His interpretation

“This link below is a real definitive explanation about person... freedom-school.com/person.pdf”

A THIRD-PARTY document he links and endorses, not the Minister's own writing — attribution belongs to freedom-school.com, not to him. He characterizes it as 'definitive'; that is his characterization. Content not verified.

Hear him teach it

His original, word for word

Preserved losslessly — nothing of his wording has been removed or altered.

Read the original in full expand

title: "The De Facto Deception & the Ground of Lawful Authority" slug: scripture-law-foundations source_title: "all creator's gifts - allcreatorsgifts.org" source_url: https://allcreatorsgifts.org/defactolinks.html type: page note: "Lossless verbatim preservation of the Minister's own words. Pure site-navigation menus and the trailing '## Assets on this page' asset/dead-image list have been removed as cruft. ALL of his prose, scripture, legal citations, statutory quotations, and external links are preserved exactly as written. Presented as HIS teachings/positions — not legal advice, not asserted as established fact."

Source: defactolinks.md

all creator's gifts .org

Check out the links !

Section 32 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, (Constitution Act 1982)

Current page - The Governor General of Canada

Archive page - The Governor General of Canada (showing defacto admission)

Dealing With Defacto Governments - The World Bank

Definitions of 'defacto'

Definitions of 'usurp'

What their bonds look like

If you register with defacto governments, they are God !

Where is Canada and what are provinces ..........

about section 30 Canada Land Surveys Act

Definitions scan

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/L-6/bo-ga:l_II-gb:s_32//en

These links and information prove that deceptive words are used to convince you to

believe a lie...

Canada is a fraud and does not encompass the recognized de facto provinces

under the 55th parallel

http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/pdp-hrp/canada/guide/gnrl-eng.cfm#a30

Section 30 from the Charter

*A reference in this Charter to a province or to the legislative assembly or

legislature of a province shall be deemed to include a reference to the Yukon

Territory and the Northwest Territories, or to the appropriate legislative

authority thereof, as the case may be.*

*The word``includes`` indicates only that which follows the word....all else

is excluded..*

*inclusio unius est exclusio alterius ....... the inclusion of one is the

exclusion of all else...*

*Notice below, the provinces known as BC Alberta etc., are not included in

the Charter but the Yukon and NWT are deemed as the provinces spoken of, No

other provinces were ever included to be in submission as Canada's

geographical borders do not encompass them.*

*The Criminal code of Canada has the same definition of applicable area for

the Criminal code and it does not ìnclude `the recognized Sovereign

provinces...it only refers to the Yukon and the NWT as provinces....The word

Ìncludes`` is essential to know the meaning of to see what has been offered

to you for your tacit acceptance

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/L-6/bo-ga:l_II-gb:s_24//en#anchorbo-ga:l_II-gb:s_24

General

Definition of "Canada Lands"

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/fr/ShowDoc/cs/L-6/bo-ga:l_II::bo-ga:l_III//fr?page=3&isPrinting=false#codese:24

24.http://laws.justice.gc.ca/fr/ShowDoc/cs/L-6/bo-ga:l_II::bo-ga:l_III//fr?page=3&isPrinting=false#codese:24

(1) In this Part, "Canada Lands" means

(a) any lands belonging to Her Majesty in right of Canada or of which the

Government of Canada has power to dispose that are situated *in Yukon, the

Northwest Territories, Nunavut or in any National Park of Canada and any

lands that are *

(i) surrendered lands or a reserve, as defined in the Indian Act,*

(ii) Category IA land or Category IA-N land, as defined in the *Cree-Naskapi

(of Quebec) Act*, chapter 18 of the Statutes of Canada, 1984,

(iii) Sechelt lands, as defined in the *Sechelt Indian Band Self-Government

Act*, chapter 27 of the Statutes of Canada, 1986,

(iv) settlement land, as defined in the *Yukon First Nations Self-Government

Act*, and lands in which an interest is transferred or recognized under

section 21 of that Act,

(v) lands in the Kanesatake Mohawk interim land base, as defined in

the Kanesatake Interim Land Base Governance Act,

other than the lands known as Doncaster Reserve No. 17, or

(vi) Tlicho lands, as defined in section 2 of the *Mackenzie Valley Resource

Management Act*; and

(b) any lands under water belonging to Her Majesty in right of Canada or in

respect of any rights in which the Government of Canada has power to

dispose.

d *This link below is a real definitive explanation about person...

http://freedom-school.com/person.pdf

Keep walking the road.

Each teaching stands on the others. Read on, see where the method has worked, or start at the beginning.

The Private Agreement & the Lawful Remedy Why I Reject the UCC “Redemption” Path The campaign Where to begin

Important. This page presents the Minister’s own teaching, preserved faithfully and attributed to him. His legal and historical readings are his positions, not settled law and not legal advice; scripture is quoted King James Version. The work is never against any people — only against institutions, offices, and the spiritual deception that binds them. Study, and seek your own counsel before acting.